Rethinking Borrowing and Promoting Leverage of European Funds
Fonds mondial pour le développement des villes (FMDV)
Since 2008, on average, traditional sources of funding for local governments in Europe have been diminishing (local taxes) or risk drying up (grants, subsidies and loans), due to the adjustments imposed as a result of the systemic crises. Due to lower government transfers and tighter bank lending, the trend is therefore towards diversifying resources or adapting some of the traditional financial mechanisms. What systems of financial engineering are emerging or becoming more prevalent? What are their limits? What have we learned about the efficiency, interconnections and complementarity of those approaches and instruments? How have they been appropriated by European local authorities at different territorial scales? What have been their impacts on indebtedness, local governance, and territorial equity? What are the needs (and responses) in terms of financial capacity building for programming, management and monitoring? The answers to these questions would require extensive cross-cutting analyses and debates among various actors (experts; institutions; public, citizen and private-sector stakeholders), though we cannot be sure that a consensus agreement would be found. That is why, through the following three case studies, our job will be – more modestly – to illustrate the dynamics of renovation in local financial strategies, which emerged each time in specific environments, but which present strong and sufficiently contextualised indications of replicability than can inspire other European local governments. At the same time, negotiations with public and private European banking and financial partners must continue and focus on long-term programmes. Indeed, the challenge is now to better integrate the progressiveness of partnerships and the capabilities of local governments of various sizes and context. The need is also to draw up legislative and regulatory adjustments more in tune with the reality of the relationships and interconnections among actors in globalised urban places.
To download : local_innovations_to_finance_cities_and_regions.pdf (1.5 MiB)
Are traditional resources vanishing?
Beginning in 2009, the economic and financial crisis caused a decrease in the budgets of local governments, and consequently in their capacity for local investment and for providing the basic services for which they are responsible. Alongside the decline in tax revenue 1 and in national subsidies and grants 2, local governments have encountered a drying up of bank loans, due to the diminished liquidity of commercial banks, but also to the collapse of specialised institutions 3, such as the Franco-Belgian bank Dexia, which estimated the lack of long-term financing for French local governments in 2012 at 6 billion euros 4. Though the situation varies from country to country, more difficult access to bank loans has forced local governments to accept increasingly high interest rates. In certain regions in Spain, for example, those rates reached 4.75% in 2010 5. In Europe, while the share of EU funds in local public investment varies greatly from one area to another, they have nevertheless helped to offset some of the recent – sometimes drastic – reductions in financial transfers from central governments to local governments 6. But which European local governments have the ability to go looking for those funds? And how long will they be able to compensate for the lack of local resources? In fact, to overcome these financing difficulties and to diversify their resources, some local governments are innovating and deploying new funding strategies.
Diversifying resources, borrowing better and differently: the trending answer for European municipalities
While several European experiments show real potential (environmental taxes, land value capture), two innovations are particularly notable, though recent and as-yet little developed: • new borrowing strategies via the issuing of bonds, be they individual, bundled and/or green and socially responsible; • and the use of leveraged European financial instruments (FIs), in the context of the European Cohesion Policy. Each demonstrates in its own way a willingness to empower local governments, thanks to the acquisition and mobilisation of independent expertise and increased financial literacy. While new borrowing strategies highlight the ability of local governments to bring together access to financial markets and sustainable urban development policies, FIs offer the opportunity of a direct funding bridge between the European Union and local governments. In our case studies, the new borrowing strategies, via bond issues, are analysed through two of their variations: • Issues of non-bundled, targeted green and socially responsible bonds, (Case study: Eco-socially responsible bond issue by the Île-de-France region) • and issues of bundled but non-targeted bonds through the creation of Local Government Funding Agencies (Case study: Kommuninvest, Sweden) The use of European financial instruments itself is explored via one of the projects of the Joint European Support for Sustainable Investment in City Areas – JESSICA programme (Case Study: The London Green Fund). We have made a conscious choice to focus on funding outside the scope of local governments (from banks, markets, the European Union) and not on local taxation. Indeed, in the context of structural, economic and social crisis, it seems vital to find solutions that depend as little as possible on the direct resources of citizens or local economic actors, whose finances are also in difficulty. While FMDV recognises taxation as the foundation of solvability, funding, and the autonomy of local governments, the diversity and complexity of local tax systems in Europe calls for a review in itself, on a case-by-case basis. In the meantime, the exploration of these innovative financial mechanisms provides a possible answer to local budgetary needs, in a frame of reference better shared across the European Union. That is also the position of the CEMR in its report on local government funding 7. Furthermore, these examples were chosen for their innovation, the originality of proposed solutions and their potential for replication. The case studies specifically address modes of governance, functioning, and impacts in the local areas.
Lessons learned and outstanding issues
It is clear that these dynamics require financial expertise: the development of technical capacities within local governments is, therefore, a crucial issue for the diversification of financial resources. That being so, empowerment, even partial, will only be relative if it creates dependency on private investors. So it is clearly a question here of always seeking a balance between endogenous and exogenous resources, and of making maximum independence from market fluctuations a goal, an element of the responsible financial management of the municipality. Other questions can also be formulated: Can these mechanisms address the current needs of local governments in terms of financing, but also of long-term sustainable development? What kind of local development do these new methods of financing produce? Other points: the mechanisms described in the case studies do not all apply to all local governments. Issues relating to the size and economic dynamism of municipalities are fundamental. Small and medium-sized municipalities do not have the same strengths and expertise as larger and more powerful local governments. What connections and cooperation can be developed between them? As the case study of Kommuninvest shows, they must find alternative solutions, which often involve more in-depth and reassessed cooperation, both horizontal and vertical (strengthened interactions among actors of a given territory, new institutions and modes of relationships). Additionally, the criterion of solvability is an essential condition. Creating financial mechanisms adapted to each level of decentralised government can contribute to reduce the debt of local authorities and therefore of central governments (balance between local administrative capacities and development of the potential of territories). Finally, a real movement is emerging among municipalities in favour of increased transparency and cooperation, in order to guarantee stable and sustainable funding. Targeting of funds is a good example of a concrete solution that allows for the linking of mechanisms for raising funds to a model of sustainable development. Because, to conclude, we mustn’t forget that financing must not be disconnected from projects, but part of a political strategy. Financing is only viable if the projects it promotes fit into the citizens and territorial needs.
1 In 2011, European municipalities experienced a decrease of 1.5% in their own resources as well as in shared taxes, after a drop of 4.5% in 2010.
2 For example: -30% in Spain, from -5% to -12% in Latvia, Romania, Italy, Czech Republic, and the United Kingdom. Dexia/CEMR report “Infra-national government budgets in Europe” (summer 2012).
3 Cities alliance (2009) Local governments and the financial crisis : an analysis bit.ly/FMDVReso-citiesalliance
4 La Tribune (2012) La crise continuera en 2013 bit.ly/FMDVReso-tribune2013 (in French)
5 The Guardian (2010) Local authorities face credit crunch amid European debt crisis
6 As an example, for Bratislava, the capital of Slovakia, the share of European funds in local public investment between 2007 and 2013 was 75%. Speech by the mayor of Bratislava during the Cities of Tomorrow Conference, Brussels, February 18, 2014.
7 CCRE. 2012. Projet « Poste de travail du futur » Assurer des emplois de qualité, modernes et durables au sein des collectivités locales et régionales. Thème 1 : Le financement des collectivités locales et régionales : défis majeurs, solutions pour relancer la croissance et autres initiatives